Post-Hearing: Ranking Senate Committee Members Discuss Regulations

11m
cointelegraph

Ron Paul Bullish on Bitcoin - “I Think It’s a Great Idea”

11m
cryptodaily

David Marcus Questioned Over Libra by Congress

13m
livebitcoinnews

Crypto Market Drops $20 Billion In 1 Hour Following Facebook’s Libra Senate Hearing

19m
zycrypto

India Might Be Banning Cryptocurrencies According To Leaked Government Documents

20m
beincrypto

SeedCX Subsidiaries Secure New York BitLicense

22m
cryptonewmedia

BitMart Lists Revolutionary Wallet Based P2P Trading DEX Aphelion…

23m
cryptonewmedia

Bitcoin Could Rebound if Facebook’s Libra Hearing Goes Well

23m
cryptocurrencynews

Dash Bears Aim at $105 As CEO Criticize Bitcoin (BTC)

25m
cryptonewmedia

Starbucks, Walt Disney and Adobe Are Blasting to Fresh Highs

26m
cryptonewmedia

Checkmate: Libra Crumbles Against The Senate, Hearing Proceeds Tomorrow.

1h
coingape

Jerry Brito: The Case for Electronic Cash in an Open and Free Society

1h
letstalkbitcoin

IMF: Crypto Assets May Surpass Traditional Forms of Money

1h
dailyhodl

Market Update: Bulls struggle to push Bitcoin towards $11k. Here’s What...

1h
zycrypto

House GOP Leader McCarthy Likes Bitcoin But Criticises Facebook’s Libra

1h
zycrypto

Cannabis Stocks Blaze as FDA Expedites Landmark CBD Rules

1h
cryptonewmedia

Bitcoin Security and Ethics with Neha Narula - WBD125

1h
letstalkbitcoin

German Finance Minister: Facebook Shouldn’t Be Allowed to Compete with the Euro

1h
coindesk

Are Cardano, Chainlink and Ravencoin doomed to continue falling?

1h
cryptoslate

“Keep Big Tech Out of Finance Act” proposes $1 million per day fine on large tech companies acting as financial institutions

1h
cryptoslate

Chainlink Price Analysis: LINK/BTC Breaks out From a Descending Wedge

1h
beincrypto

Facebook Stresses Libra’s Compliance With FinCEN at Senate Hearing

1h
cointelegraph

Newsflash: Bitcoin Crashes Below $10,000

1h
cryptonewmedia

Bitcoin Dips Below $10,000 for the Second Time in July

1h
cointelegraph

Pound Dives on Boris Plans to Suspend Parliament

2h
cryptonewmedia


ICON Is Back? 40+ Candidates Applied For Its Election Campaign

After more than a year of relative silence, ICON is generating some buzz with its latest efforts to bring blockchain to the masses.

This year, ICON launched ICONSENSUS, a self-described journey toward mass adoption of blockchain that includes four components related to the governance of the network and to its expansion and development.

Now the first phase, the election of the network governors, is beginning to take shape.

Maintaining a decentralized network is a critical component of any public blockchain project, and ICON is designating that responsibility to the community. Twenty-two public representatives (P-Reps) will be elected by the ICON community in September, and those selected will have a distributed responsibility for maintaining the network.

Already, the election has 43 candidates, giving users plenty of options for choosing their representatives who will be tasked with producing and verifying blocks, validating transactions, proposing and voting on network policy changes, and promoting growth on the ICON ecosystem.

Those selected in P-Rep elections will receive both economic benefits and voting weight, which makes the process a critical component of ICON’s development.

In 2018, TRON and EOS, two blockchain platforms that are striving to produce mature decentralized ecosystems, used an election mechanism with their communities.

Both projects had mixed results to say the least.

Community members elected Super Representatives and Block Producers respectively, and their campaigns attracted significant media attention, something that didn’t always help the platform mature.

When Lucien Chen, a co-founder of TRON left the company, he indicated that the platform itself controls many of the Super Representatives, calling into question the merits of its decentralized ethos.

Moreover, TRON’s election process was marred by information gaps that cast a shadow on the launch and made their appeals to transparency appear less sincere than they intended. Ultimately, it’s the ability to build a decentralized network that matters most.

Similarly, EOS was plagued by a vote buying scandal that called into question the platform’s integrity at a time when it was trying to bolster a community-centered reputation.

Although their elections were intended to create faster, more capable ecosystems, their many shortcomings served to upend each platform’s progress.

In an effort to learn from their predecessors, ICON’s elections provide rewards intended to incentivize decentralization. Whether it’s the continual rewards for ICONists who participate in the election or the full-circle inclusion through ecosystem expansion projects, the rewards seem to be more aligned with a decentralized network that other DPoS platforms.

ICON’s elections are expected to occur in September, and candidates are already targeting ICONists for their vote. Many candidates are communicating directly with community members through online channels like the ICON subreddit.

Given the crypto community’s past experience with election campaigns, there is an inherent incredulity about ICON’s ability to carry out fair elections that promote decentralization and community empowerment. Although the project has been largely silent for the past 18 months, it appears that it has managed to grow its community and ready to their voices in an important election. Here’s to hoping it doesn’t follow their predecessors’ path in the process.

Regarding any copyrights issue, please contact us:content@hashbee.com.

0 comments